tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6210535581221463950.post8320925920594716550..comments2023-08-02T07:08:25.191-07:00Comments on IESM: Supreme Court Judjement.on 08 Mar 2010..Maj Dhanapalan's caseIndian ExServicemen Movementhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15074131359293729187noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6210535581221463950.post-42232631026621653872012-03-14T10:49:53.266-07:002012-03-14T10:49:53.266-07:00I was commissioned on 25 jul 1983 and retired on 0...I was commissioned on 25 jul 1983 and retired on 01 Feb 2003 with ranks service from 09 Dec 1963 to 24 Jul 1983. Am I eligible for Capt rank pay from Aug 1987 (Actg Capt) and substantive Capt from 25 Jul 1989. My personal number SL 03025X Major Nazar Singh Gill PPO No M/003862/2002 (email -majornazarsgill@yahoo.com or Majornsgill3025@gmail.com). Please advise to register my name with RDOAINDIA and takeup my case and membership registeration and payment mode etc.MAJOR NAZAR SINGH GILLhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06293645309933497719noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6210535581221463950.post-36278131669489703372010-03-31T07:04:41.116-07:002010-03-31T07:04:41.116-07:00As per Sc Judgement 'The benefit be extended t...As per Sc Judgement 'The benefit be extended to all eligible officers'covering all officers who were in service during the erroneous implementation of the IV pay commission recommendation.The Govt may have its own financial constraits to delay paying arrears..I dont find any doubt about the status of the SC judgement Maj(Retd) S K Sharma, JaipurAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6210535581221463950.post-82150371469464566172010-03-30T04:53:06.946-07:002010-03-30T04:53:06.946-07:00AT PRESENT WE ARE AT THE MERCY OF PDA BANK CLERKS ...AT PRESENT WE ARE AT THE MERCY OF PDA BANK CLERKS WORKING OUT OUR PENSION/ DA HIKES AND ARREARS WHICH MANY TIMES REQUIRES RECHECK ,Can we take up a case wherein PCDA PENSIONS DOES IT DIRECTLY SO AS TO AVOID DELAY AND ERRORS<br />majormehandru@gmail.comred tophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15233443831808229685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6210535581221463950.post-19675792133171735052010-03-17T08:08:57.456-07:002010-03-17T08:08:57.456-07:00There is a news item in Economic Times which says ...There is a news item in Economic Times which says that this judgement of Supreme Court is not applicable to officers commissioned or retired post 1996 as they were covered under 5th and 6th pay commissions .Is this statement correct as far as officers who were holding the rank of Capt /Major /Lt Col /Col /Brig as on 01Jan 1986 and who retired after 01 Jan 1996 .Please clarify .LT.COL.(RETD) K.B.MATHURhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09448185714665532013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6210535581221463950.post-29798983626862468702010-03-10T07:24:40.402-08:002010-03-10T07:24:40.402-08:00On the official web site of The Hon'ble Suprem...On the official web site of The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India,http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/ the "case status" button reveals that the status is "pending". The above mentioned posting may therefore be in need of reconciliation.slhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01783279172831388828noreply@blogger.com